Borna Coric vs Stan Wawrinka Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

What do second serve statistics reveal about a player's form? In the past six months, Coric managed to win 43.87% of points on his second serve, while Wawrinka achieved a slightly higher percentage of 47.06%. Second serve performance often holds a significant correlation to predicting match outcomes, hinting at the possible favorite in an intense face-off.

When it comes to return game proficiency, who holds the edge? Coric, in current form, has won 44.21% of points from his opponent's second serve. In contrast, Wawrinka tops this with 46.41%. In first serve return scenarios, Coric captures 23.67% of points, with Wawrinka slightly ahead at 25.58%. These figures often indicate the player favored in head-to-head duels.

How well do these competitors handle pressure? Coric has managed to save 56.82% of breakpoints faced recently, whereas Wawrinka saved 54.11%. This aspect is critical, especially for in-game prognostications where the ability to mitigate pressure can turn the tide.

If we explore general trends, Coric has an upper hand with a 59.68% match win rate over the last year, against Wawrinka's 46.15%. Both players exhibit distinct strengths depending on the surface, with Coric excelling on Indoor hard courts, winning 61%, and Wawrinka proficient on clay with a 67% win rate.

What about the event level? Coric predominantly competes in Challenger and ITF tournaments, securing 78.13% of victories there, while Wawrinka faces tougher competition on the main tour, with a 35.29% success rate. The quality of opposition varies, as Wawrinka usually encounters players with an average rank of 109.56, compared to Coric’s opponents averaging a rank of 213.74.

Turning the spotlight on their head-to-head encounters, Wawrinka has a commanding lead with four victories out of five matches against Coric. In direct clashes, Wawrinka has won nine sets to Coric’s three, stamping his authority in their meetings. However, when matches extend to a deciding set, both have shown parity with a 1-1 record.

In extreme pressure situations like tiebreaks, Wawrinka also edges Coric, having secured victory in their solitary tiebreak duel. Historical patterns are valuable, but live event stats demand attention too for an informed prognosis.

When converting breakpoints, a crucial match stat, Wawrinka maintains a minor advantage, succeeding 28.3% of the time, compared to Coric's 27.49%. Such metrics provide valuable insight for those anticipating live match fluctuations.

Considering these metrics and historical insights, Wawrinka seems positioned to edge out Coric, given his superior record in pivotal moments and a better head-to-head performance. This forecast leans in favor of the seasoned Wawrinka, based on strategic analysis and data trends.